Key Characteristics of Nottinghamshire

Comment

Representation ID: 30412

Received: 14/01/2018

Respondent: Miss Sonya Ward

There appears to be no discussion of the particular geological features of the area, or of the subsidence which exists in many parts of the County as a legacy of the mining industry and which has caused extensive damage to properties over the past few decades.

Comment

Representation ID: 30565

Received: 13/01/2018

Respondent: Historic England (East Midlands)

Agent: Historic England (East Midlands)

Q6 Response- Heritage data refers solely to heritage at risk and relates to one paragraph (4.14). Does the HLC or HER offer any additional baseline information that could assist the SA and Plan moving forward?

Q7 Response- There are no apparent inaccuracies in heritage at risk data which is monitored annually.

Q8 Response- There are omissions in the characteristics section for Historic and Cultural heritage. Creswell Crags should be included, para 4.12 should include reference to waterside settlements where the River Trent is mentioned due to potential for palaeolithic remains. Non-designated heritage assets should be referred to possibly in para.4.14.

Comment

Representation ID: 30634

Received: 12/01/2018

Respondent: Natural England

Q8. We acknowledge that the environmental baseline information included within the report generally provides sufficient information on the natural environment.