SP7 - Green Belt
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 590
Received: 25/03/2022
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
There should be no encroachment into the Green belt.
There should be no development of waste and management facilities in the Green Belt.
There are no ‘very special circumstances for any development’ in the Green Belt.
Without a strong determination not to develop the Green Belt in waste and management facilities SO3 cannot be achieved.
There should be no encroachment into the Green belt.
There should be no development of waste and management facilities in the Green Belt.
There are no ‘very special circumstances for any development’ in the Green Belt.
Without a strong determination not to develop the Green Belt in waste and management facilities SO3 cannot be achieved.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 603
Received: 28/03/2022
Respondent: Susan Edwards
The proposed incinerator at Ratcliffe on Soar is in the green belt. As all indications are that if we reach our recycling targets of 65% by 2030 then we will already have incineration capacity to deal with all local residual waste, what are the very special circumstances allowing this incinerator to be built? Why are we not stopping new incinerators being built when we already have capacity to deal with predicted local residual waste? No toxic polluting incinerator should be allowed in the green belt even without the enormous carbon footprint.
The proposed incinerator at Ratcliffe on Soar is in the green belt. As all indications are that if we reach our recycling targets of 65% by 2030 then we will already have incineration capacity to deal with all local residual waste, what are the very special circumstances allowing this incinerator to be built? Why are we not stopping new incinerators being built when we already have capacity to deal with predicted local residual waste? No toxic polluting incinerator should be allowed in the green belt even without the enormous carbon footprint.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 613
Received: 01/04/2022
Respondent: Graeme Foster
Policy SP7 reflects National Planning Policy and is supported.
Policy SP7 reflects National Planning Policy and is supported.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 690
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Newark and Sherwood District Council
Paragraph 7.53
Comment:
Parts of Newark and Sherwood District Council’s administrative area are within the Green Belt.
At present, this is omitted from this paragraph and this needs to be amended.
Recommended Change:
The first sentence of this paragraph needs to be amended to include reference to Newark and
Sherwood District, as parts of the District are within the Green Belt.
Please find attached Newark and Sherwood District Council’s consultation response to the Draft Waste Local Plan. Our response was
approved by the Council’s Economic Development Committee on the 23 March 2022.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 691
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Newark and Sherwood District Council
Policy SP7 Green Belt
Comment:
Waste management developments are not a type of development the NPPF expressly states
are considered to be appropriate in the Green Belt. Many types of waste management
developments may constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt and Policy SP7
needs to be more explicit in this regard.
It is suggested that the first part of this policy refers to the need for development proposals
to constitute appropriate development, as the second paragraph then sets out how
inappropriate development will be dealt with.
Recommended Change:
It is recommended that the following be added to the first sentence of Policy SP7 after “will
only be approved” “where it constitutes appropriate development and where …”.
Please find attached Newark and Sherwood District Council’s consultation response to the Draft Waste Local Plan. Our response was
approved by the Council’s Economic Development Committee on the 23 March 2022.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 793
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Mick George Ltd
SP6
We support Strategic Policy SP5: Climate Change. We also support Strategic Policy SP6: Minimising the Movement of Waste. We understand the requirements to limit the movement across administrative boundaries unnecessarily. We also support Strategic Policy SP7: Green Belt and Strategic Policy SP8: Safeguarding Waste Management Sites.
Representation on behalf of Mick George Ltd to the Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Draft Waste Local Plan.
See Representations.
These representations are submitted by Mick George Ltd (MGL), which is one of the largest waste
and aggregates companies in the East of England and in the East Midlands. This representation is
designed to support the promotion of Dorket Head as an inert landfill site and to make more general
comments about the strategy proposed to be adopted in the Waste Local Plan. The company has
been unable to participate in the local Plan process before now as it has only recently acquired the
rights to develop the site.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 814
Received: 12/04/2022
Respondent: Shlomo Dowen
Strategic Policy SP7 should be amended to explicitly extend Green Belt protection to Local Green Spaces, as per paragraph 103 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Only Solutions LLP’s Submission to
the Nottinghamshire and Nottingham
Waste Local Plan Consultation.
See accompanying Representations for details.