DM6 – Historic Environment
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 594
Received: 25/03/2022
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
The exceptions mean that there are no circumstances where development cannot take place.
Transparent criteria of benefits that outweigh harm/loss.
The desire to encourage the historic environment, assets and landscapes is mitigated by the rest of the policy.
The exceptions mean that there are no circumstances where development cannot take place.
Transparent criteria of benefits that outweigh harm/loss.
The desire to encourage the historic environment, assets and landscapes is mitigated by the rest of the policy.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 620
Received: 01/04/2022
Respondent: Graeme Foster
Policy DM6 reflects the NPPF and is supported.
Policy DM6 reflects the NPPF and is supported.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 696
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Newark and Sherwood District Council
Policy DM6 Historic Environment
Comment:
It is considered that the first point of this policy requires clarification and that the addition of
the words “heritage asset” after “significance of a designated …” would achieve this.
Recommended Change:
It is suggested that the words “heritage asset” after “significance of a designated …” in point
1 of this policy should be added.
Please find attached Newark and Sherwood District Council’s consultation response to the Draft Waste Local Plan. Our response was
approved by the Council’s Economic Development Committee on the 23 March 2022.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 728
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
Policy DM6 Historic Environment
We welcome the inclusion of a policy for the historic environment. We would request that ‘historic assets’ is replaced with ‘heritage assets’ and that the policy focusses on conserving and enhancing the ‘significance’ of heritage assets and their setting, in line with Section 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 800
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Mick George Ltd
DM6
We also support policy DM2 – Health, Wellbeing and Amenity, policy DM3 – Design of New and
Extended Waste Management Facilities, policy DM4 – Landscape Protection, policy DM5 – Protecting and Enhancing Biodiversity, policy DM6 – Historic Environment, policy DM7 ‐ Water resources and Flood Risk, policy DM8 – Public Access, policy DM10 – Cumulative Impacts of Development, policy DM11 – Airfield Safeguarding, and policy DM12 ‐ Highway Safety and Vehicle Movements/Routeing.
Representation on behalf of Mick George Ltd to the Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Draft Waste Local Plan.
See Representations.
These representations are submitted by Mick George Ltd (MGL), which is one of the largest waste
and aggregates companies in the East of England and in the East Midlands. This representation is
designed to support the promotion of Dorket Head as an inert landfill site and to make more general
comments about the strategy proposed to be adopted in the Waste Local Plan. The company has
been unable to participate in the local Plan process before now as it has only recently acquired the
rights to develop the site.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 868
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
We would recommend re-visiting the NPPF and in
particular paragraphs (not exhaustive to) 194, 195, 199, 200, 201 to ensure that the policy included within the Plan is NPPF
compliant. We would request a clause that states that where harm exists, schemes will try to avoid the harm, minimise the
harm in the first instance, and only then weigh the harm against the public benefits. Clause 2 is currently insufficient. In clause
5, we would recommend removal of ‘where relevant’ and instead focus on achieving enhancements for the historic
environment, heritage assets and their setting in all opportunities possible. As you have referenced in the opening paragraph of
this section the historic environment is ‘an irreplaceable resource’ and is also a great asset for an areas economic, social and
cultural development and all opportunities to conserve and enhance the historic environment should be sought.
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 869
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
Following on from the above comments, we would further recommend some amendments to the justification text including,
referencing assets as ‘heritage assets’, spelling error ‘moments’ to ‘monuments’ and additional detail relating to each of the clauses within the policy and how they should be achieved. We support references to the local list within paragraph 8.65. We
support references to the potential impacts to setting and cumulative impacts within paragraph 8.66. We consider that some
re-ordering of the paragraphs would sit better once the wording of the policy is finalised.
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 870
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
Clause 4/ paragraph 8.75 recording the loss of heritage assets should be a last resort but where it is necessary then we would
expect that the information should be updated to the Historic Environment Record (HER) held by the Councils, at least.
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 871
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
We support the inclusion of justification text relating to assessing impacts to significance and would recommend that a clause is
included within the policy to set out what the expectations are - that these paragraphs provide the additional detail for. We
support the preparation of specific heritage impact assessment or similar documents that set out how the significance of any
heritage assets may be affected as a result of proposed development, and to be undertaken by appropriate, qualified
professionals.
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.
Comment
Nottinghamshire and Nottingham Draft Waste Local Plan January 2022
Representation ID: 872
Received: 04/04/2022
Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)
Justification text should further expand upon additional material within the policy as a result of re-visiting the NPPF paragraphs
and Section 16 generally, as identified above. If the Council wish to send some additional draft policy material to Historic
England ahead of the next formal consultation, we would be happy to provide additional comments and advice.
We are very pleased to see a specific historic environment policy within the Local Plan and welcome its inclusion
Many thanks for consulting Historic England on the above consultation.
Please find our comments attached in Table 1; we look forward to working with the Council’s as they progress their Waste Local Plan.
We commented on this document at an earlier stage in the process, 6 May 2020, and raised several general points and signposted a range of Historic England advice on our website. Please utilise this earlier response alongside our additional comments made within this response, to allow you to have a range of advice.
We are available to offer further advice on Development Management Policy 6: Historic Environment, if you would like to take us up on this offer please contact me using the above details.