5.30

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Pre- Submission Draft Waste Local Plan

Representation ID: 892

Received: 26/09/2023

Respondent: Shlomo Dowen

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

As set out in response to 2.3 and 5.24, the WNA failed to account for measures and targets that can be expected to boost recycling and reduce residual waste arisings from both household and non-household waste. When this is taken into account it is clear that Option A is the most realistic option.

Note: Only Solutions LLP is challenging the soundness and legal compliance relating to this consultation point. We have no position on the duty to co-operate, but there is no option to indicate this in the interactive online consultation system.

Change suggested by respondent:

Adopt Option A, or an alternative which better reflects Government recycling and waste reduction targets.

Full text:

As set out in response to 2.3 and 5.24, the WNA failed to account for measures and targets that can be expected to boost recycling and reduce residual waste arisings from both household and non-household waste. When this is taken into account it is clear that Option A is the most realistic option.

Note: Only Solutions LLP is challenging the soundness and legal compliance relating to this consultation point. We have no position on the duty to co-operate, but there is no option to indicate this in the interactive online consultation system.