11. Glossary

Showing comments and forms 1 to 1 of 1

Object

Pre- Submission Draft Waste Local Plan

Representation ID: 903

Received: 26/09/2023

Respondent: Shlomo Dowen

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

1. It is incorrectly stated that :”The leftover ash can be recycled, if suitable, or sent to landfill.” at the end of the definition of incineration.

2. The use of incinerator bottom ash for aggregate is not a form of recycling and does not contribute to recycling targets.
The definition of Greenfield site is wrong for the same reasons that previously developed land is correctly defined in 8.6

Note: Only Solutions LLP is challenging the soundness and legal compliance relating to this consultation point. We have no position on the duty to co-operate.

Change suggested by respondent:

1. Change last sentence on incineration to state: “Leftover ash can be used for purposes such as aggregate if suitable but may end up being sent to landfill."

2. Correct Greenfield site entry to include land that has been developed for minerals extraction or waste disposal by landfill, where provision for restoration has been made through development management procedures.

Full text:

1. It is incorrectly stated that :”The leftover ash can be recycled, if suitable, or sent to landfill.” at the end of the definition of incineration.

2. The use of incinerator bottom ash for aggregate is not a form of recycling and does not contribute to recycling targets.
The definition of Greenfield site is wrong for the same reasons that previously developed land is correctly defined in 8.6

Note: Only Solutions LLP is challenging the soundness and legal compliance relating to this consultation point. We have no position on the duty to co-operate.