DM4 – Landscape Protection

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Support

Pre- Submission Draft Waste Local Plan

Representation ID: 963

Received: 09/10/2023

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Support Policy DM4.

Full text:

Support Policy DM4.

Object

Pre- Submission Draft Waste Local Plan

Representation ID: 1029

Received: 11/10/2023

Respondent: Historic England (Midlands)

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This policy would benefit from consideration of heritage as a component of landscape. Additionally, how is the historic environment being protected and conserved through this policy and ensuring a positive strategy for the historic environment?

Previous comments still stand.
We would request a reference to heritage landscapes within this policy and the recognition that design, landscaping, planting and restoration principles should be appropriate to the historic landscape that they are in and the setting of heritage assets, where appropriate. We are pleased to see reference to landscape character appraisal evidence that the Councils already have.

Change suggested by respondent:

We would request a reference to heritage landscapes within this policy and the recognition that design, landscaping, planting and restoration principles should be appropriate to the historic landscape that they are in and the setting of heritage assets, where appropriate.

Full text:

Our specific comments are attached in Table 1, appended to this letter.
Many thanks for the opportunity to comment on this Regulation 19 Pre-Submission version of the Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire Waste Plan, October 2023. We would like to refer you back to the comments that Historic England raised during the Regulation 18 consultation in April 2022, as largely they remain relevant.
Unfortunately, we do not consider that the Waste Plan has set out a positive strategy for the historic environment, as required by paragraph 190 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
There are a number of questions that we have raised in our consultation response about the potential impacts/harm for the significance of the historic environment, heritage assets and their setting.
Whilst we welcome the inclusion of a specific historic environment policy, and we consider this essential, we have raised a number of concerns about specific wording issues and policy areas that are absent from inclusion.
Further, there are a number of policy areas discussed within the Plan where there is the potential for harm to the historic environment and yet there is little or no detail on how this harm can be avoided or mitigated or what measures are required in order to assess the harm. As such we find that these policy areas are not legally compliant or effective.

We would be happy to discuss these issues with the Council and consider appropriate wording that could be included within the Plan to overcome these issues and are available to enter into a Statement of Common Ground if the Councils consider this is an appropriate way forward.

If you have any questions, please contact us.

(Please see attached for table and full representation).