Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Search representations
Results for P.A.G.E. search
New searchComment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 22: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM1: Protecting local amenity?
Representation ID: 30836
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We support the wording of this policy on protecting local amenity
We support the wording of this policy on protecting local amenity
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 23:What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM2: Water resources and flood risk?
Representation ID: 30837
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We support the wording
We support the wording
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 24: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM3: Agricultural land and soil quality
Representation ID: 30838
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We support the wording
We support the wording
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 25: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM4: Protection and enhancement of biodiversity and geodiversity
Representation ID: 30839
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We support the wording
We support the wording
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 25: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM4: Protection and enhancement of biodiversity and geodiversity
Representation ID: 30840
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
The use of the term "European Commission" in 5.52 should be replaced. The provision of alternative habitat described in 5.54 needs to be approved by independant experts such as the RSPB
The use of the term "European Commission" in 5.52 should be replaced. The provision of alternative habitat described in 5.54 needs to be approved by independant experts such as the RSPB
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 26: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM5: Landscape character
Representation ID: 30841
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We welcome this policy but consider that specific landscape and visual impact assessments should be required to accompany applications in order to ensure that all impacts are properly assessed.
We welcome this policy but consider that specific landscape and visual impact assessments should be required to accompany applications in order to ensure that all impacts are properly assessed.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 27: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM6: Historic environment
Representation ID: 30842
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We support the previously submitted response by Muskham Vale Heritage Group regarding to the north and west of the Sth Muskham Archaeology resource area. There is also a need for a regulation governing the procedure to be adopted when unexpected archaelogical finds are discovered during workings. It may be necessary to halt or suspend workings.
We support the previously submitted response by Muskham Vale Heritage Group regarding to the north and west of the Sth Muskham Archaeology resource area. There is also a need for a regulation governing the procedure to be adopted when unexpected archaelogical finds are discovered during workings. It may be necessary to halt or suspend workings.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 28: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM7: Public access
Representation ID: 30843
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
Support
Support
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 29: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM8: Cumulative impact?
Representation ID: 30844
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
Agree wording but it should be emphasised that cumulative impacts of road transport from different sites should be legitimate concerns.
Agree wording but it should be emphasised that cumulative impacts of road transport from different sites should be legitimate concerns.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 30: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM9: Highways safety and vehicle movements/routeing?
Representation ID: 30845
Received: 19/09/2018
Respondent: P.A.G.E.
We welcome this policy but suggest there is a need to also require alternative sites with shorter or more environmentally acceptable routes to market to be preferred.
We welcome this policy but suggest there is a need to also require alternative sites with shorter or more environmentally acceptable routes to market to be preferred.
