Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Ibstock Brick search
New searchComment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 1: What do you think of the draft vision and strategic objectives?
Representation ID: 31156
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
The statement in S07;
'Ensure heritage assets (archaeological, historic buildings, settlements, landscapes, parks and gardens) and their settings are adequately protected and where appropriate enhanced.'
Should be amended to acknowledge that in relation to archaeological, the destructive nature of extraction means they aren't preotected or enhanced but that details of archaeologicsal interest are accurately recorded for historical purposes.
The statement in S07;
'Ensure heritage assets (archaeological, historic buildings, settlements, landscapes, parks and gardens) and their settings are adequately protected and where appropriate enhanced.'
Should be amended to acknowledge that in relation to archaeological, the destructive nature of extraction means they aren't preotected or enhanced but that details of archaeologicsal interest are accurately recorded for historical purposes.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 3: What do you think of the draft strategic policy for minerals provision?
Representation ID: 31157
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
The draft policy would seem wholly appropriate in identifying a preference for site allocation but embracing the flexibility for site selection.
The draft policy would seem wholly appropriate in identifying a preference for site allocation but embracing the flexibility for site selection.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 9: What do you think of the draft strategic policy for minerals safeguarding, consultation areas and associated minerals infrastructure?
Representation ID: 31163
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
It is important for Mineral Planning Authorities to safeguard mineral resources and the policy as set out seems to offer suitable mineral protection in line with National Policy. The content of SP8 seems entirely reasonable.
It is important for Mineral Planning Authorities to safeguard mineral resources and the policy as set out seems to offer suitable mineral protection in line with National Policy. The content of SP8 seems entirely reasonable.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?
Representation ID: 31164
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
Ibstock Brick thank the Mineral Planning Authority for the effort to date in the preparation of the Mineral Plan. A change of circumstance has however meant that the proposed allocation North of Woodborough Lane is not not available.
The proposal for the North of Woodborough Lane extension to the Dorket Head quarry should be removed from the plan.
In January 2018, as part of the Nottingham Mineral Plan 'call for sites', Ibstock Brick submitted proposals for the allocation of land north of Woodborough Lane. This would serve as a 20 - 25 year future clay supply to the Dorket Head Factory beyond the life of the existing quarry of circa 15 years.
The north of Woodborough Lane proposal was identified through a detailed sieving exercise relating to multiple sites locally, all of which had the potential to serve as future clay supply sites to Dorket Head, including those owned by Ibstock. North of Woodborough Lane was selected as the preferred site based on selection criteria, including the locality and mitigation of impacts. The north of Woodborough Lane site would have been a direct extension of the existing clay quarry south of Woodborough Lane, extending the working relationship with the mineral landlord of that site.
The mineral and surface owner relating to north of Woodborough Lane has reconsidered his position and has now requested that we cease promotion of that land in the Mineral Plan and do not seek to allocate it as currently proposed. Ibstock Brick will fully respect this decision and so will formally ask the County Planning Authority to recognise this in the minerals plan, the closing date for comments on which is the 28th September 2018.
Moving forward, Ibstock will review the opportunities identified for all of the other sites considered in its preparation for allocation in the Mineral Plan and may consider the promotion of one or more of those sites as an alternative site allocation. Allied with this, Ibstock place great emphasis on the 'criteria based approach' to site selection as referred in the Draft Mineral Plan and my simply seek to rely on this element of the policy for the future allocation of an appropriate site either in the development control process or as part of the mineral plan review.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?
Representation ID: 31168
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
In light of the removal from the plan of land north of Woodborough Lane, it will be necessary to identify further land allocation in the mineral plan, drawing from site searches completed previously. It is also entirely relevant and appropriate to retain the criteria based approach to allow flexibility in the plan should an alternative site not be identifiable and secured during the plan preparation process.
In light of the removal from the plan of land north of Woodborough Lane, it will be necessary to identify further land allocation in the mineral plan, drawing from site searches completed previously. It is also entirely relevant and appropriate to retain the criteria based approach to allow flexibility in the plan should an alternative site not be identifiable and secured during the plan preparation process.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 22: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM1: Protecting local amenity?
Representation ID: 31175
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
The content of the policy would seem appropriate in identifying broad brush areas for consideration, subject always to Screening and Scoping (where appropriate) which may identify certain of the topic areas not necessary. The policy should perhaps be clear that not all of the subject matters will need detailed consideration in every application and that each application will be relevant to the specifics of that site.
The content of the policy would seem appropriate in identifying broad brush areas for consideration, subject always to Screening and Scoping (where appropriate) which may identify certain of the topic areas not necessary. The policy should perhaps be clear that not all of the subject matters will need detailed consideration in every application and that each application will be relevant to the specifics of that site.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 34: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM13: Incidental mineral extraction?
Representation ID: 31179
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
The policy seems entirely beneficial and potentially a fundamental aspect of prior extraction when allied to safeguarding policies.
The policy seems entirely beneficial and potentially a fundamental aspect of prior extraction when allied to safeguarding policies.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?
Representation ID: 31182
Received: 28/09/2018
Respondent: Ibstock Brick
Ibstock Brick thank the Mineral Planning Authority for the effort to date in the preparation of the Mineral Plan. A change of circumstance has however meant that the proposed allocation North of Woodborough Lane, site MP6C is not not available. Ibstock will now look to the alternative sites considered in the selection process to identify a suitable allocation to ensure the long term security of the clay supply to the Dorket Head factory.
In January 2018, as part of the Nottingham Mineral Plan 'call for sites', Ibstock Brick submitted proposals for the allocation of land north of Woodborough Lane. This would serve as a 20 - 25 year future clay supply to the Dorket Head Factory beyond the life of the existing quarry of circa 15 years.
The north of Woodborough Lane proposal was identified through a detailed sieving exercise relating to multiple sites locally, all of which had the potential to serve as future clay supply sites to Dorket Head, including those owned by Ibstock. North of Woodborough Lane was selected as the preferred site based on selection criteria, including the locality and mitigation of impacts. The north of Woodborough Lane site would have been a direct extension of the existing clay quarry south of Woodborough Lane, extending the working relationship with the mineral landlord of that site.
The mineral and surface owner relating to north of Woodborough Lane (MP6C) has reconsidered his position and has now requested that we cease promotion of that land in the Mineral Plan and do not seek to allocate it as currently proposed. Ibstock Brick will fully respect this decision and so will formally ask the County Planning Authority to recognise this in the minerals plan.
Moving forward, Ibstock will review the opportunities identified for all of the other sites considered in its preparation for allocation in the Mineral Plan and may consider the promotion of one or more of those sites as an alternative site allocation. Allied with this, Ibstock place great emphasis on the 'criteria based approach' to site selection as referred in the Draft Mineral Plan and mAy simply seek to rely on this element of the policy for the future allocation of an appropriate site either in the development control process or as part of the mineral plan review.