Waste Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Severn Trent Water Ltd search
New searchComment
Waste Issues and Options
Question 13
Representation ID: 451
Received: 06/05/2020
Respondent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Agent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
We believe that the plan for the environment could be more ambitious. Objective 3 is loosely defined around protecting the environment. More importantly, there should be a commitment to work with other stakeholders, including Severn Trent Water, to ensure that there is not deterioration against Water Framework Directive waterbody status and, where possible, enhance the environmental status.
Comment
Waste Issues and Options
Question 14
Representation ID: 452
Received: 06/05/2020
Respondent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Agent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Severn Trent note that paragraph 6.1 details that new waste facilities will be close to the main urban areas. Whilst this approach may be appropriate for Recycling and Households Waste Sites (RHWS), it is not appropriate for Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW), historically WwTW have generally been located away from built up areas due to the nature of their operation and the nuisance that could be caused. WwTW area also generally located in low lying locations near watercourses as such the location of any new WwTW may not fit with the principles outlined within paragraph 6.1 this should be accounted for by clarifying that Sewerage assets such as WwTW and Pumping stations, area exempt from the principles of paragraph 6.1.
It is also important to note that Severn Trent have a significant amount of groundwater abstraction sources in the planned area. Care will be needed to ensure that any new waste management facility is appropriately located at suitable distances from groundwater source protection zones, as defined by the Environment Agency.
Comment
Waste Issues and Options
Question 15
Representation ID: 453
Received: 06/05/2020
Respondent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Agent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Severn Trent would highlight that as detailed within our response to Question 14, sites required for new sewerage assets, will need to meet a different needs to other Waste Management sites, whilst there are similarities in term of need to protect the environmental and the risk of nuisance from odour, traffic, lighting etc. as Sewerage assets also rely of topographical and hydrological featuresto identify appropriate sites, it should be clear that a separate process will be needed to identify the
most suitable sites.
We would also highlight the need to ensure that residential development near existing assets should
be managed carefully to protect these assets, and enable their continued operation.
Comment
Waste Issues and Options
Question 16
Representation ID: 454
Received: 06/05/2020
Respondent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Agent: Severn Trent Water Ltd
Severn Trent would support the inclusion of and continued consideration of ‘flooding and water
resources’ as highlighted in paragraph 7.2.
To enable the sustainable supply of potable water for Nottinghamshire residents and businesses, it
is vital that groundwater and surface waters are protected from pollution. Due to the nature of waste
sites, they pose a greater risk to water than domestic dwellings, and we therefore support the need
to highlight water resources and the need to protect them.
We are also aware that as part of several pollution mitigation process for waste sites, it may be
necessary to connect surface water to the foul / combined sewers. This approach has the risk to
exceed the standard design capacity for the sewerage system. It is therefore important that where
possible, surface water is managed appropriately. The following principles should therefore be
followed unless other pollution prevention requirements are needed.
1) All non-waste operational area’s i.e. roofs, roads (where possible) should be directed
towards a sustainable surface water outfall in accordance with the Drainage Hierarchy.
2) All areas of a waste site that can be drained to a sustainable surface water outfall are treated
through an appropriate number of treatment train / process to ensure pollution is not caused
or flood risk increased.
3) Where possible any waste handling / storage areas should be covered to prevent excess
rainwater entering the foul sewerage system
4) Any areas of a waste site connected to the foul /combined sewer should incorporate suitable
mitigation / attenuation of storm flows, where not separated.
The Idle and Torne Permo-Triassic aquifer is currently at poor status. We have an obligation as
abstractions under the Water Framework Directive to not further deteriorate the waterbody by
increasing abstractions. Demand management is one of the mechanisms we have in our Water
Resource Management Plan to manage this risk. We are working with stakeholders to ensure that
we use water resources more effectively. We therefore recommend that rainwater harvesting and
(where appropriate) grey water harvesting is utilised on site, to minimise the water consumption
needs, especially for tasks such as wheel washing or dust suppression.
As per our response to Question 15, we would highlight the need to protect existing sewerage and
water supply assets from new development, in such that the operation of these sites is not
adversely effected by new development.
Please keep us informed when your plans are further developed when we will be able to offer more
detailed comments and advice.
