Waste Issues and Options
Search representations
Results for Development Management NCC search
New searchComment
Waste Issues and Options
Question 14
Representation ID: 387
Received: 03/03/2020
Respondent: Development Management NCC
Representation Summary:
Table 8 of the WCS does include the word ‘indicative’ in the title but I suppose some sort of overlapping on the
tonnages and/or site size might give a little more flexibility when considering the suitability of sites. Also, for all the
recycling sites (except HWRCs), Table 8 is effectively saying that sites cannot be any bigger than three hectares in
size. Why is that restriction there, or why is there not a restriction on HWRCs.
Also, why do small recycling sites have to be at least 0.5 hectares in size.
A bit of thought on those types of issues would be good if that approach is to be taken again.
For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.
