Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Representation ID: 30894
Received: 20/09/2018
Respondent: Cemex UK operations
CEMEX strongly objects to the plan provision because the policy significantly underprovides for the needs of the economy as stated in the response to Q10. In addition, the provision contains no margin for the uncertainties in geological evaluation, the restraints imposed via planning conditions and obligations., and mitigation sterilisation arising from the EIA process. To reinforce this point provision attributed to Cromwell and East Leake are incorrect due to recent reappaisals. In particular CEMEX notes the exclusion of sites it has promoted at Cromwell North and Barton in Fabis which it intends to bring forward in the near future.
CEMEX strongly objects to the plan provision because the policy significantly underprovides for the needs of the economy as stated in the response to Q10. In addition, the provision contains no margin for the uncertainties in geological evaluation, the restraints imposed via planning conditions and obligations., and mitigation sterilisation arising from the EIA process. To reinforce this point provision attributed to Cromwell and East Leake are incorrect due to recent reappaisals. In particular CEMEX notes the exclusion of sites it has promoted at Cromwell North and Barton in Fabis which it intends to bring forward in the near future.