Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Representation ID: 30961
Received: 22/09/2018
Respondent: Greenfield Associates
Agent: Greenfield Associates
For minerals development that have a direct impact on Local Wildlife Sites, a "need for and benefits of the development in that location outweigh the impacts". However for higher level sites (eg SSSI) the benefits need to be shown rather than a need.
Does an allocation within the Mineral Plan give a presumed need for a minerals development.?
For minerals development that have a direct impact on Local Wildlife Sites, a "need for and benefits of the development in that location outweigh the impacts". However for higher level sites (eg SSSI) the benefits need to be shown rather than a need.
Does an allocation within the Mineral Plan give a presumed need for a minerals development.?