Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Representation ID: 31144

Received: 28/09/2018

Respondent: Mrs Jackie Armstrong

Representation Summary:

Agricultural Land: CAGE welcomes the candour of 3.60 in relation to the impact of mineral extraction on agricultural land. In many cases, however, restoration of a significant proportion of land surface - to create agricultural land or land-based habitat - is largely dependent upon sourcing inert fill, affordably close to the development. The permanent removal of best and most versatile soils to another site is just blatant asset-stripping of the neighbourhood and its landscape, and an excuse for a low- grade restoration.

Full text:

Agricultural Land: CAGE welcomes the candour of 3.60 in relation to the impact of mineral extraction on agricultural land. In many cases, however, restoration of a significant proportion of land surface - to create agricultural land or land-based habitat - is largely dependent upon sourcing inert fill, affordably close to the development. The permanent removal of best and most versatile soils to another site is just blatant asset-stripping of the neighbourhood and its landscape, and an excuse for a low- grade restoration.