Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Representation ID: 31147

Received: 28/09/2018

Respondent: Mrs Jackie Armstrong

Representation Summary:

CAGE strongly supports DM5 but believes it needs strengthening, giving more weight to residents wishes in determining the best restoration scheme.

The Trent Washlands are not the only landscape particularly under pressure from minerals development - the Village Farmlands, East Nottinghamshire Sandlands are equally under threat, from both Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire Local Minerals Plans. For proper review the evidence base must record safeguarding areas, minerals sites, landscapes, roads, rivers, airbases etc beyond the county borders.

Cooperation between neighbouring authorities on Minerals Plans needs to be made transparent to show a proper concern for those living on the County borders.

Full text:

CAGE strongly supports DM5 but believes it needs strengthening, giving more weight to residents wishes in determining the best restoration scheme.

The Trent Washlands are not the only landscape particularly under pressure from minerals development - the Village Farmlands, East Nottinghamshire Sandlands are equally under threat, from both Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire Local Minerals Plans. For proper review the evidence base must record safeguarding areas, minerals sites, landscapes, roads, rivers, airbases etc beyond the county borders.

Cooperation between neighbouring authorities on Minerals Plans needs to be made transparent to show a proper concern for those living on the County borders.