MP5: Secondary and Recycled Aggregates
Object
Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Publication Version
Representation ID: 122
Received: 11/10/2019
Respondent: Mr J Potter
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
It is unsound and unjustified LPA &/or ' highways'
(their): hard-surfacing too much, works degrading land, excessive demolition re buildings; so even down to MP5 recycling at Bunny,
Unsound and unjustified publication minerals local plan; objections letter on policy MP2 proposal MP2p at Mill Hill Barton-in-Fabis. Objections: This representor's 2018, Issues and Options consultation comment, is to be reappraised an objection. • My (&) numerous - what are now MP2p-related - objections written in on the politically withdrawn minerals local plan, and on what is now a MP2p-related planning application, are essentially relevant
concerning this consultation process; including my letter at 2018's Draft plan.
• The planning and environmental mal-cumulative - noting DM8 5.97. - everything else that's been foisted at the adjacent, rural parish - and out towards Lockington; where's the geographical spread in that. • Is it not somewhat volte-face - when the County Council tends to policy prefer site extensions - that Shelfo rd 's currently considered too sizeable.
A description to a local planning authority (LPA) is under way
re where 'would not want to see what looks very damaging 'fracking'. The plan's (MP1) undertow throughout would be provision-linked to LPAs'
negative urbanizing vision. • It is unsound and unjustified LPA &/or ' highways'
(their): hard-surfacing too much, works degrading land, excessive demolition re buildings; so even down to MP5 recycling at Bunny,
with regard to my local environment, the publication version is: failing, environmental-degradation complicit, encroaching, in a number of matters wasteful, environmentally unsound.
• Mis-presenting representation(s) 'observed; and the County Council lack of involvement with, concerning the Clifton area committee(s).
Regarding the above, for the Examination Hearing Sessions, it is necessary I request participation.
Support
Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Publication Version
Representation ID: 266
Received: 11/10/2019
Respondent: Tarmac
Agent: Heaton Planning Ltd
Tarmac support the MPA in seeking the use of alternative aggregates and the appreciation
that there are limits on how far alternatives can substitute primary aggregate. Whilst
support for alternative aggregate should be encouraged in the Plan, the contribution should
be viewed as a ‘bonus’ over and above the required amount of primary aggregate. This is
reflective of the NPPF (para 204 (b)) which states that local Plans should take account of the,
‘contribution that substitute or secondary and recycled materials and minerals waste would make’. The reduction in ash materials from coal fired power stations is also likely to increase the demand for primary aggregate over the Plan period to address this specific resource shortfall. The approach to recycled aggregates reflects the Mineral Products Association Long Term Aggregates Demand and Supply Scenarios Paper which indicates that the
potential for recycling has reached an optimum level (approximately 28-30% volume).
See attached