Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Search representations
Results for Gedling Borough Council search
New searchComment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q1 Do you think any further information should be included in the overview of the area?
Representation ID: 30284
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
No comments.
No comments.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q2 Do you agree with the draft vision? Are there other things we should include?
Representation ID: 30285
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
The vision is supported.
The vision is supported.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q3 Are the above strategic issues appropriate? Are there others we should consider?
Representation ID: 30286
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
Yes the strategic issues are appropriate.
Yes the strategic issues are appropriate.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q4 Do you think the average 10 year sales figure is the most suitable methodology for forecasting future demand in Nottinghamshire? If not please identify any alternatives
Representation ID: 30287
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
Yes this approach accords with National Planning policy.
Yes this approach accords with National Planning policy.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q5 Do you think the same methodology (most recent average 10 year sales) should be used for each aggregate or is there merit in using different methodologies for different aggregates?
Representation ID: 30288
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
Yes agreed.
Yes agreed.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q6 Do you think extensions to existing permitted quarries should be prioritised over new greenfield quarries
Representation ID: 30289
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
In general yes.
In general yes.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q7 Should different approaches (new sites/extensions to existing permitted quarries) be adopted for individual mineral types?
Representation ID: 30290
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
This is unlikely to be necessary as the various impacts from different types of mineral extraction are similar.
This is unlikely to be necessary as the various impacts from different types of mineral extraction are similar.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q8 How important is it to maintain a geographical spread of sand and gravel quarries across the County to minimise transport distances
Representation ID: 30291
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
No comments.
No comments.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q9 Would it be more appropriate to prioritise specific areas above others?
Representation ID: 30292
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
No comments.
No comments.
Comment
Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation
Q10 Is it economical to transport mineral by river barge and if so should proposed quarries with the potential for moving sand and gravel by river barge be prioritised over other proposals?
Representation ID: 30293
Received: 11/01/2018
Respondent: Gedling Borough Council
No comments.
No comments.