Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Search representations

Results for Gedling Borough Council search

New search New search

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q11 Are you aware of any other issues relating to Sherwood Sandstone provision that should be considered through the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30294

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

we are not aware of any other issues. GBC notes that NCC has received a planning application for an extension to the Bestwood 2 quarry for an additional 1.4 million tonnes. The County has consulted the Borough Council on the planning application and there is no need for further comment.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q12 Is there evidence to suggest that additional crushed rock reserves are required to meet demand in Nottinghamshire over the plan period? If so please provide this evidence.

Representation ID: 30295

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q13 Are you aware of any other issues relating to crushed rock provision that should be considered through the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30296

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q14 Are you aware of any issues relating to alternative aggregates that should be considered through the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30297

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q15 Should the Plan identify a specific replacement quarry (remote extension / new site) to Dorket Head clay pit or should a criteria based policy be developed?

Representation ID: 30298

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

GBC considers it is important to identify additional resource at the earliest opportunity through a plan led approach and GBC's preferred option would be for a site specific allocation for a remote extension/new site with its second preference being a sufficiently concise area of search. This would provide the most certainty for the both the operator, the local community and assist in forward planning at the Borough level.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q16 Is a criteria based policy the most suitable approach to cover the potential for new brick works and associated clay pits?

Representation ID: 30299

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

Given the importance of the brickworks, the location and sheer extent of the identified clay resource GBC would have concerns about relying on a criteria based policy.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q17 Should the plan seek to identify specific site allocations for gypsum provision or should a criteria based policy be developed?

Representation ID: 30300

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q18 Are you aware of any issues regarding the provision of gypsum that should be considered as part of the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30301

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q19 Are you aware of any issues regarding the provision of Silica sand that should be considered as part of the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30302

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

Comment

Minerals Local Plan Issues and Options consultation

Q20 Are you aware of any issues regarding the provision of industrial dolomite that should be considered as part of the Minerals Local Plan review?

Representation ID: 30303

Received: 11/01/2018

Respondent: Gedling Borough Council

Representation Summary:

No comments.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.