Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Search representations

Results for Cemex UK operations search

New search New search

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 11: What do you think of the draft site specific sand and gravel allocations?

Representation ID: 30894

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

CEMEX strongly objects to the plan provision because the policy significantly underprovides for the needs of the economy as stated in the response to Q10. In addition, the provision contains no margin for the uncertainties in geological evaluation, the restraints imposed via planning conditions and obligations., and mitigation sterilisation arising from the EIA process. To reinforce this point provision attributed to Cromwell and East Leake are incorrect due to recent reappaisals. In particular CEMEX notes the exclusion of sites it has promoted at Cromwell North and Barton in Fabis which it intends to bring forward in the near future.

Full text:

CEMEX strongly objects to the plan provision because the policy significantly underprovides for the needs of the economy as stated in the response to Q10. In addition, the provision contains no margin for the uncertainties in geological evaluation, the restraints imposed via planning conditions and obligations., and mitigation sterilisation arising from the EIA process. To reinforce this point provision attributed to Cromwell and East Leake are incorrect due to recent reappaisals. In particular CEMEX notes the exclusion of sites it has promoted at Cromwell North and Barton in Fabis which it intends to bring forward in the near future.

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 12: What do you think of the draft site specific Sherwood Sandstone allocations?

Representation ID: 30895

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 13: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for crushed rock over the plan period?

Representation ID: 30896

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 14: What do you think to the draft policy regarding secondary and recycled aggregates?

Representation ID: 30897

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

CEMEX support this policy but consider that the policy should go further by encouraging the provision of secondary/recycling aggregate infrastructure at mineral workings particuarly where there is associated landfilling and ready mix concrete plant.

Full text:

CEMEX support this policy but consider that the policy should go further by encouraging the provision of secondary/recycling aggregate infrastructure at mineral workings particuarly where there is associated landfilling and ready mix concrete plant.

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?

Representation ID: 30898

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 16: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for Gypsum?

Representation ID: 30899

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 17: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for silica sand over the plan period?

Representation ID: 30900

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 18: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for industrial dolomite over the plan period?

Representation ID: 30901

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 19: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for building stone over the plan period?

Representation ID: 30902

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

Comment

Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan

Question 20: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for coal over the plan period?

Representation ID: 30903

Received: 20/09/2018

Respondent: Cemex UK operations

Representation Summary:

No comment

Full text:

No comment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.