Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Coddington Parish Council search
New searchComment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 11: What do you think of the draft site specific sand and gravel allocations?
Representation ID: 30796
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
Coddington Parish Council supports the policy of spatial distribution of aggregates and the consideration given to distance and access to markets. The policy is well presented.
Coddington Parish Council supports the policy of spatial distribution of aggregates and the consideration given to distance and access to markets. The policy is well presented.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 12: What do you think of the draft site specific Sherwood Sandstone allocations?
Representation ID: 30797
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 13: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for crushed rock over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30798
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
Will future demand remain at the same level as more use is made of other types of building materials?
Will future demand remain at the same level as more use is made of other types of building materials?
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 14: What do you think to the draft policy regarding secondary and recycled aggregates?
Representation ID: 30799
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
There is little information on how much secondary/recycled aggregate is used. There is a need for data to be collected at a national and county level.
There is little information on how much secondary/recycled aggregate is used. There is a need for data to be collected at a national and county level.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?
Representation ID: 30800
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 16: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for Gypsum?
Representation ID: 30801
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
Coddington Parish Council values the clarity of the report. Direct access to the A1 and A46 is imperative for the Bantycock Quarry, to avoid the use of minor rural roads particularly in view of extensive housing developments in the immediate area.
Coddington Parish Council values the clarity of the report. Direct access to the A1 and A46 is imperative for the Bantycock Quarry, to avoid the use of minor rural roads particularly in view of extensive housing developments in the immediate area.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 17: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for silica sand over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30802
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 18: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for industrial dolomite over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30803
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 19: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for building stone over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30804
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 20: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for coal over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30805
Received: 17/09/2018
Respondent: Coddington Parish Council
No comment.
No comment.
