Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Newark & Sherwood District Council search
New searchComment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 11: What do you think of the draft site specific sand and gravel allocations?
Representation ID: 30755
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
The extension of quarries at Langford Lowfields South and West and Langford Lowfields North is considered preferable to the identification of new extraction sites in Newark & Sherwood District. NSDC is therefore supportive.
The extension of quarries at Langford Lowfields South and West and Langford Lowfields North is considered preferable to the identification of new extraction sites in Newark & Sherwood District. NSDC is therefore supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 12: What do you think of the draft site specific Sherwood Sandstone allocations?
Representation ID: 30756
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 14: What do you think to the draft policy regarding secondary and recycled aggregates?
Representation ID: 30757
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 13: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for crushed rock over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30758
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 15: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for brick clay?
Representation ID: 30759
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive. It is important that the impacts on residential amenity of the quarry in Kirton continue to be managed satisfactorily.
NSDC is supportive. It is important that the impacts on residential amenity of the quarry in Kirton continue to be managed satisfactorily.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 16: What do you think of the draft site specific allocation for Gypsum?
Representation ID: 30760
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
The extension of Bantycock Quarry is considered preferable to the identification of new extraction sites in Newark & Sherwood District. NSDC is therefore supportive.
The extension of Bantycock Quarry is considered preferable to the identification of new extraction sites in Newark & Sherwood District. NSDC is therefore supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 17: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for silica sand over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30761
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 18: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for industrial dolomite over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30762
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 19: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for building stone over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30763
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 20: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for coal over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30764
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
