Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Newark & Sherwood District Council search
New searchComment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 21: What do you think of the draft policy to meet demand for hydrocarbons over the plan period?
Representation ID: 30765
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive, but would emphasise the importance of a thorough and robust assessment of impacts on the environment and residential amenity.
NSDC is supportive, but would emphasise the importance of a thorough and robust assessment of impacts on the environment and residential amenity.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 22: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM1: Protecting local amenity?
Representation ID: 30766
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive. Page 98 is a duplicate of page 88 and three paragraphs (5.5, 5.6 and 5.7) are missing.
NSDC is supportive. Page 98 is a duplicate of page 88 and three paragraphs (5.5, 5.6 and 5.7) are missing.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 23:What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM2: Water resources and flood risk?
Representation ID: 30767
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 24: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM3: Agricultural land and soil quality
Representation ID: 30768
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 25: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM4: Protection and enhancement of biodiversity and geodiversity
Representation ID: 30769
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive, and the reference to the ppSPA in paragraph 5.47 is welcomed.
NSDC is supportive, and the reference to the ppSPA in paragraph 5.47 is welcomed.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 26: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM5: Landscape character
Representation ID: 30770
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 27: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM6: Historic environment
Representation ID: 30771
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive, and the references to the archaeological resource area at South Muskham in paragraph 4 of the policy and paragraph 5.78 are welcomed.
NSDC is supportive, and the references to the archaeological resource area at South Muskham in paragraph 4 of the policy and paragraph 5.78 are welcomed.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 28: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM7: Public access
Representation ID: 30772
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 29: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM8: Cumulative impact?
Representation ID: 30773
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
Comment
Draft Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan
Question 30: What do you think of the draft policy wording for DM9: Highways safety and vehicle movements/routeing?
Representation ID: 30774
Received: 13/09/2018
Respondent: Newark & Sherwood District Council
NSDC is supportive.
NSDC is supportive.
