Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Publication Version

Object

Representation ID: 223

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Para 2.4 It is not clear from where the information regarding residential building units is derived. Furthermore, in relation to the Plan the period of time over which the homes will be delivered should be that of the plan period.
Without this amendment the Plan cannot be said to be “positively prepared”.

Object

Representation ID: 224

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

SO1. Amend the second sentence

Object

Representation ID: 225

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Amend Plan 3: Key diagram

Object

Representation ID: 226

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Amend the policy wording

Support

Representation ID: 227

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

BAL supports this policy.

Object

Representation ID: 228

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

BAL supports policy however amendments are required.

Object

Representation ID: 231

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Sand and gravel provision over the over the plan period needs to be reassessed to meet future demand.
See attachments for further detail

Object

Representation ID: 232

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

In respect of Policy MP2 additional sites will need to be allocated. As currently the policy only provides for an additional 11.8MT to be added to the current landbank when the actual shortfall is 60.82MT. This means that additionally a further 49.02MT of reserves are needed to make the plan sound. BAL propose that the It should be noted that the existing reserves identified in Policy MP2 add up to a higher figure (23.31MT) than that used in the following justifying paragraphs site at Shelford which is capable of delivering a total of 6.5MT should be allocated.

Object

Representation ID: 233

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

BAL objects to the wording of policy DM5 the first part of which would prevent any mineral development coming forward.

Object

Representation ID: 235

Received: 11/10/2019

Respondent: Brett Aggregates Limited

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

There is a tension between the policy in respect of the effect on Best and Most Versatile Land (BMVL) and the biodiversity led restoration proposals which underpin the Plan.