Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan Publication Version
Appendix 4: Monitoring and Implementation Table
Key outcomes (Strategic Objectives) |
Performance indicator |
Monitoring method / source |
Constraints/ risks |
Target |
Trigger |
Further considerations/ mitigation measures |
POLICY SP1 – MINERALS PROVISION |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions: - Allocated or not - Extension or new site 10-year and 3-year average for aggregate minerals Number of jobs created by minerals development All proposals accord with amenity and environmental protection policies |
Planning application documents Planning permissions delegated or committee reports Local Aggregate Assessment |
Lack of data/ monitoring method on economic trends relating to non-aggregate minerals |
All applications granted satisfy the strategy for supply All applications granted meet all amenity and environmental protection policy targets |
Significant number of applications approved which do not satisfy strategy for supply (more than 10%) Any amenity and environmental protection policy triggers met |
Review of applications to identify why granted contrary to strategy for supply Review policy to ensure supply of mineral is maintained |
POLICY SP2 – BIODIVERSITY LED RESTORATION |
||||||
Inter connectivity between existing habitats and restoration schemes will be achieved and the biodiversity of the County will be improved (SO6) |
Number of planning permissions with biodiversity-led restoration schemes Number of planning permissions granted contrary to advice from: - Natural England - Environment Agency Area of habitat loss, gain and net-gain/loss (including Habitats of Principal Importance, LBAP habitats and designated sites) |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Lack of detail in restoration schemes to identify if biodiversity-led Lack of data available on biodiversity and Water Framework Directive targets |
All applications granted have biodiversity-led restoration scheme Increase in habitat creation/ improvement in local biodiversity and Water Framework Directive targets |
Significant number of applications approved which do not have a biodiversity-led restoration scheme (more than 10%) Significant decrease in biodiversity /Water Framework Directive targets being met |
Review application to identify reasons for non-biodiversity-led restoration. Review policy and site development briefs to ensure the biodiversity-led strategy is given greater priority (where appropriate) |
POLICY SP3 – CLIMATE CHANGE |
||||||
New proposals will be resilient to the impacts of climate change (SO3) |
Number of planning permissions judged to have an unacceptable impact on climate change Number of planning permission including climate change minimisation and or mitigation measures |
Planning application documents Planning permissions delegated or committee reports |
Local climate change impacts are difficult to measure |
No applications granted that identify: - unacceptable climate change impacts – do not include climate change adaptation measures where applicable |
Significant number of applications approved which identify unacceptable climate change impacts (more than 10%) Significant number of applications approved which do not include climate change adaptation measures where applicable (more than 10%) |
Review of application to identify circumstances of decision Review policy to ensure impacts on climate change are considered in more depth |
POLICY SP4 – SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT |
||||||
Non-road transport for new/extended mineral sites (SO1, SO3, SO5) |
Number of planning permissions using alternatives to road transport Number of planning permission granted contrary to advice from: - Highways England - Highways Authority |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Lack of data in notices/ reports on sustainable transport |
All applications granted include an element of non-road transport. Road transport distances/ use is minimised All applications granted fully mitigate any transport impacts |
Significant number of applications granted contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review applications to identify why sustainable transport methods were not utilised/ maximised Review policy to ensure sustainable transport is given greater priority in decision making |
POLICY SP5 – THE BUILT, HISTORIC AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT |
||||||
To protect and enhance the built and natural environment from adverse developmental impacts (SO6, SO7) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary advice from: - Natural England - Historic England - Environment Agency - Environmental Health Officer Changes in environmental/ amenity indicators (including all criteria in policy) for the County |
Planning permissions delegated or committee reports |
Lack of contextual data and on links between available data on County environment context and minerals development |
All applications granted protect and enhance environmental/ amenity quality. |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review policy to ensure that environmental/ amenity protection and enhancement is strengthened |
POLICY SP6 – THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE GREEN BELT |
||||||
To ensure new minerals development does not compromise the openness and purpose of land within the Green Belt (SO6) |
Number of planning applications granted within the Green Belt where restoration does not maintain the openness and purpose of the Green Belt |
Planning permissions delegated or committee reports |
Restoration schemes may be subject to variation prior to implementation |
All applications granted in Green Belt include restoration that maintains the openness and purpose of the Green Belt |
Any planning permissions granted in the Green Belt with restoration schemes which do not maintain the openness and purpose of the Green Belt |
Review policy to ensure greater priority given to maintenance of openness and purpose of Green Belt in restoration schemes |
POLICY SP7 – MINERALS SAFEGUARDING, CONSULTATION AREAS AND ASSOCIATED MINERALS INFRASTRUCTURE |
||||||
To prevent mineral sterilisation and preserve the mineral for future use (SO1, SO2, SO3, SO4) |
Number of planning permissions for non-mineral development granted by the Local Planning Authority contrary to the Minerals Planning Authority's advice. |
Mineral Planning Authority observations on non-minerals development. Local Planning Authority records |
Only applications where Minerals Planning Authority has been consulted will be recorded |
No applications for non-minerals development granted where mineral safeguarding objection raised |
Permission for non-minerals development granted where objection raised on mineral safeguarding grounds |
Review reasons for approval Review policy if necessary given reasons found above |
POLICY MP1: AGGREGATE PROVISION |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral (SO2) |
Planning permissions consistent with MP2, MP3 and MP4 |
As per MP2, MP3 and MP4 |
As per MP2, MP3 and MP4 |
Achievement of MP2, MP3 and MP4 targets |
Any of MP2, MP3 or MP4 triggers met |
Review MP2, MP3 or MP4 as appropriate Review of MP1 if necessary |
POLICY MP2: SAND AND GRAVEL PROVISION |
||||||
To maintain an adequate supply of sand and gravel to meet the 7-year landbank requirement (SO2) |
Number of planning applications granted on non-allocated sites Size of landbank and production figure |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Local Aggregates Assessment |
- |
Maintenance of landbank and annual production consistent with apportionment Planning permissions consistent with allocations |
Landbank more than 10% below requirement Permission granted on non-allocated land |
Review Local Aggregate Assessment for possible explanation Review of allocations |
POLICY MP3: SHERWOOD SANDSTONE PROVISION |
||||||
To maintain an adequate supply of Sherwood sandstone to meet the 7-year landbank requirement (SO2) |
Number of planning applications granted on non-allocated sites Size of landbank and production figure |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Local Aggregates Assessment |
- |
Maintenance of landbank and annual production consistent with apportionment Planning permissions consistent with allocations |
Landbank more than 10% below requirement Permission granted on non-allocated land |
Review Local Aggregate Assessment for possible explanation Review of allocations |
POLICY MP4: LIMESTONE PROVISION |
||||||
To maintain an adequate supply of limestone to meet the 10-year landbank Requirement (SO2) |
Number of planning applications granted on non-allocated sites Size of landbank and production figure |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Local Aggregates Assessment |
- |
Maintenance of landbank and annual production consistent with apportionment Planning permissions consistent with allocations |
Landbank more than 10% below requirement Permission granted on non-allocated land |
Review Local Aggregate Assessment for possible explanation Review of allocations |
POLICY MP5: SECONDARY AND RECYCLED AGGREGATES |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral and encourage the use of secondary and recycled minerals (SO1, SO2) |
Annual production of recycled and secondary aggregates and percentage this represents of overall aggregate production Number of planning applications granted for aggregate or other mineral recycling plants |
Minerals Product Association Sustainability Report Waste Planning Authority planning applications records |
Lack of local data |
Increase production/ consumption of recycled and secondary aggregates |
Decrease in production/ consumption of recycled and secondary aggregates |
Review policy to give greater priority to increasing production/ consumption of recycled and secondary aggregates |
POLICY MP6: BRICK CLAY PROVISION |
||||||
To maintain an adequate supply of brickclay to meet the 25-year landbank requirement (SO2) |
Number of planning applications granted on non-allocated sites Size of landbank per site |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Minerals Local Plan (for baseline) |
Landbank figure will be an estimate |
Maintenance of landbank per site All planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Landbank more than 10% below requirement Permission granted on non-allocated land where policy criteria not met |
Review policy and allocations |
POLICY MP7: GYPSUM PROVISION |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Permission granted on non-allocated land where policy criteria not met |
Review policy and allocations |
POLICY MP8: SILICA SAND PROVISION |
||||||
To maintain an adequate supply of silica sand to meet the 10-year landbank requirement (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria Size of landbank |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Minerals Local Plan (for baseline) |
Landbank figure will be an estimate |
Maintenance of landbank Planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted on non-allocated land where policy criteria not met |
Review policy and allocations |
POLICY MP9: INDUSTRIAL DOLOMITE PROVISION |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral for the international market (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Permission granted on non-allocated land where policy criteria not met |
Review policy and allocations |
POLICY MP10: BUILDING STONE PROVISION |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral and preserve and enhance local historic distinctiveness (SO2, SO7) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with allocations or policy criteria |
Permission granted on non-allocated land where policy criteria not met |
Review policy and allocations |
POLICY MP11: COAL |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with policy criteria Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Natural England - Historic England - Environment Agency - Environmental Health Officer |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review policy to address criteria that were not met in permissions |
POLICY MP12: HYDROCARBON MINERALS |
||||||
Maintaining an adequate supply of mineral (SO2) |
Number of planning permissions consistent with policy criteria Number of planning applications granted contrary advice from: - Natural England - Historic England - Environment Agency - Environmental Health Officer - Health and Safety Executive |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review policy to address criteria that were not met in permissions |
DM1: PROTECTING LOCAL AMENITY |
||||||
Providing a good standard of amenity and protecting from adverse developmental impacts (SO5) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Environment Agency - Environmental Health Officer - Public Health England - Highways Authority Number of substantiated complaints received regarding minerals developments |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Minerals Planning Authority Monitoring and Enforcement Team complaints records |
Reliant on professional opinions/ assessments of impacts and discussion of these in reports/notices |
All planning permissions have no adverse impact on the elements set out in the policy |
Number of planning permission granted which identify unacceptable impacts on local amenity (measured through grants contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator) (>0) |
Review policy to address criteria that were not met in permissions |
POLICY DM2: WATER RESOURCES AND FLOOD RISK |
||||||
To protect water resources and protect from flooding (SO3, SO6) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to Environment Agency advice on flooding and water quality/provision grounds Number of planning applications granted which include flood alleviation benefits Number of planning applications granted which include SuDS |
Planning application documents Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Reliant on discussion of these elements in reports/ notices |
No planning permissions have detrimental impact on water resources and unacceptable impact on flooding |
Number of planning permissions granted contrary to Environment Agency advice (>0) |
Review reasons for granting permission contrary to advice Review policy |
POLICY DM3: AGRICULTURAL LAND AND SOIL QUALITY |
||||||
To provide for the conservation of the best and most versatile agricultural land and to provide for the conservation of soil resources (SO8) |
Area of best and most versatile agricultural land lost Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Natural England advice on best and most versatile agricultural land |
Natural England Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Limited to infrequent national level data, which will reflect land lost to all development, not just minerals |
All minerals development directed to the lowest grade of agricultural land possible No planning permissions have detrimental impact on soil quality |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review reason for approval Review policy |
POLICY DM4: PROTECTION AND ENHANCEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY AND GEODIVERSITY |
||||||
To protect and enhance the biodiversity and geodiversity of Nottinghamshire from adverse developmental impacts (SO3, SO6) |
Significant adverse change in biodiversity and geodiversity assets in the County Number of planning applications granted contrary to Natural England advice Area of habitat loss, gain and net-gain/loss (including Habitats of Principal Importance, LBAP habitats and designated sites) |
Natural England, Local Biodiversity Action Plans Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
No data on direct links between mineral workings and changes in habitat/ biodiversity |
No planning permissions result in adverse impact on biodiversity/ geodiveristy All planning permissions bring about enhancements to biodiversity/ geodiveristy |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from Natural England (more than 10%) Decrease in biodiversity targets being met |
Review policy to give greater priority to protection and enhancement to biodiversity/ geodiversity |
POLICY DM5: LANDSCAPE CHARACTER |
||||||
To maintain, protect and enhance the character and distinctiveness of the landscape (SO6, SO8) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Natural England |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports and decision notices |
Reliant on professional opinions/ assessments of impacts and discussion of these in reports/notices |
All planning permissions have no adverse impact as set out in the policy |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review reasons for granting permission contrary to advice Review policy |
POLICY DM6: HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT |
||||||
To conserve important heritage assets (SO7) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Historic England Number of planning applications granted subject to a watching brief for archaeology |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Reliant on professional opinions/ assessments of impacts and discussion of these in reports/notices |
All planning permissions have no adverse impact as set out in the policy |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review reasons for granting permission contrary to advice Review policy |
POLICY DM7: PUBLIC ACCESS |
||||||
To prevent negative impacts on existing public access routes and improve and enhance the Rights of Way network where possible (SO5, SO6) |
Number of planning permissions involving the permanent loss of a Right of Way Number of planning permissions securing additional Rights of Way through restoration |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions have no adverse impact on Rights of Way and increase public access through restoration (where appropriate) |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice Countryside Access Team (more than 10%) Planning permission granted resulting in permanent loss of Right of Way |
Review reasons for loss of Right of Way Review policy |
POLICY DM8: CUMULATIVE IMPACT |
||||||
Prevention of negative cumulative impacts (SO1, SO3, SO5, SO6, SO7, SO8) |
Number of planning applications granted despite unacceptable cumulative impacts |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
Reliant on discussion of cumulative impact in reports/notices |
No unacceptable cumulative impacts arise from minerals development |
Planning permissions granted that give rise to unacceptable cumulative impact |
Review policy to strengthen cumulative impact assessment |
POLICY DM9: HIGHWAYS SAFETY AND VEHICLE MOVEMENTS/ ROUTEING |
||||||
Improved highway safety and appropriate routeing schemes (SO1, SO3, SO5, SO6, SO7) |
Planning applications granted contrary to advice from: - Highways England - Highways Authority |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) |
Review policy to address criteria that were not met in permissions |
POLICY DM10: AIRPORT SAFEGUARDING |
||||||
Risk to air safety is minimised (SO1, SO5) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice from airfields |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
No overseeing body, therefore advice will be on an air-field by air-field basis and could be inconsistent |
No applications permitted against airfield advice |
Permission granted contrary to airfield advice |
Review reasons for approval against advice Review policy in light of above |
POLICY DM11: PLANNING OBLIGATIONS |
||||||
Requirements from development will be met (SO1, SO5) |
Number of planning permissions with signed S106 agreements |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports Minerals Planning Authority legal records |
Delay between permission and signing of S106 may delay monitoring |
All permissions granted with S106 where needed |
Significant number of planning applications without S106 (more than 10%) |
Review reason for lack of S106 If no justification, review policy |
POLICY DM12: RESTORATION, AFTER-USE AND AFTERCARE |
||||||
Land will be reclaimed at the earliest opportunity and high-quality restoration and after care will be achieved (SO1, SO3, SO5, SO6, SO7, SO8) |
Number of planning applications granted contrary to advice on restoration from: - Natural England - Environment Agency Number of planning permissions involving importation of waste meeting criteria in policy |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All applications granted subject to restoration scheme that satisfies all policy criteria |
Significant number of applications approved contrary to advice from those set out in performance indicator (more than 10%) Significant number of applications involving importation of waste approved contrary to policy criteria (more than 10%) |
Review reasons for approval against advice Review of policy to address weak areas identified |
POLICY DM13: INCIDENTAL MINERAL EXTRACTION |
||||||
Promotion of sustainable development and conservation of mineral resources (SO1, SO2) |
Number of planning permissions assessed against this policy that are not granted permission on its grounds |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All applications seeking mineral extraction as part of wider development are granted, subject to criteria in policy being met |
Significant number of proposals being refused on grounds of this policy |
Review reasons for refusals Review policy if necessary to address refusal grounds (if appropriate) |
POLICY DM14: IRRIGATION LAGOONS |
||||||
To provide benefits to agricultural productivity (SO1, SO2) |
Number of planning permissions for irrigation lagoons granted contrary to the criteria in the policy |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met |
Review reasons for not meeting policy criteria Review policy |
POLICY DM15: BORROW PITS |
||||||
To allow for the sustainable use of minerals close to specific projects (SO1, SO2) |
Number of planning permissions for borrow pits granted contrary to the criteria in the policy |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met |
Review policy |
POLICY DM16: ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT |
||||||
Ensuring associated development is not permitted unless linked to minerals development (SO1) |
Number of planning permissions for associated industrial development that are not related/linked to life of the site |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met |
Review policy |
POLICY DM18: MINERAL EXPLORATION |
||||||
To allow for exploration to determine the presence of minerals (SO1, SO2) |
Number of planning applications assessed against this policy granted contrary to criteria in the policy |
Planning permissions decision notices and delegated or committee reports |
- |
All planning permissions consistent with policy criteria |
Permission granted where policy criteria not met |
Review policy |